by The Register, Mark Shuttleworth, founder of Ubuntu Linux said that the company is
working to make the Ubuntu desktop “more beautiful” in the next two
years — to something that’s art.
“I think the great task in front of us in the next two years is to lift
the experience of the Linux desktop from something stable and usable and not
pretty, to something that’s art,” Shuttleworth said.
“Think of the way the iPhone uses a pure software experience, it abstracts
away all the hardware,” he said. “You can paint anything on the
screen because it’s all software.”
My skeptical side says, “no way.”
My optimistic side says,
My positive side says, “thhhpt.”
I’ve said it before — people just want something that works. Plain and
simple. There’s edge cases sure–but they don’t count (sorry).
Apple has an edge right now because of a false perception of Vista in the
marketplace, one that Apple successfully groomed and grew through a series of very
successful (and very misleading) advertisements (the Mac and Windows guy ads). Apple
has YEARS of experience with user experience. So does Microsoft (I’ll point
out that one of Microsoft’s biggests problem with user experience is the
desire to not make a large group of users unhappy by changing the operating system
dramatically — it’s not by any means due to lack of designer talent).
Comparitively, the Linux camp really has zero years of experience competitively.
Can the Ubuntu crowd innovate and not copy? Linux GUI’s have historically
cloned, not innovated.
Ubuntu seems to be a mix of OSX and Windows. Take a look at
KDE though (the shell of choice for many Linux
Wow! Look, on the left is the “start button”, followed by the
“Start” menu from Windows 2000 (or maybe a little earlier).
Let’s see, big ugly quick start buttons. A Calendar that looks more like a toy
than a professional widget, 2 rows of tasks in the “task bar”, and a
series of tray icons for some things that must be running that are always available.
For haters of Windows, they certainly copied the user experience adequately.
If Ubuntu creates something that is “art” … will it be so
different that few will adopt it?
I’m interested to see what happens … will they be able to innovate on
the Linux platform or will legacy applications and requirements (the platform) hold
them back? Even eye candy won’t make Linux easier. If they can take the
“unix” out of Linux … then, maybe they’ll have something (or
do what Apple did, and take just the good of a platform and shield users away from
it at all costs, except allow nerds access).
It’s going to take more than a few years and a desire to make this happen.
Even having funding won’t necessary make it happen. Look and Lindows, I mean
Linspire, I mean Xandros Linspire. They had staff, funding, and a desire to put
Linux on every desktop. Bzzzzzt. Didn’t happen. What’s changed?
Are you interested if something came out from Ubuntu? How revolutionary would it
need to be for you to adopt? Or have web applications made platform matter less?