Ember.JS and EZdata, and Rails

I’ve been trying to do some additional work on my ember.js extension for data management. At the same time though, I’ve been trying (to learn and) build a simple Ruby on Rails web demo application using the new JavaScript library. There have been more than a few things that have mystified me about the framework and the structuring of an application. One aspect in particular was how to best manage foreign keys and join tables with the ActiveRecord class (and the corresponding SQL tables). So many tutorials have the same lame example of: a CART, an ORDER, a CUSTOMER …, that it’s often difficult to apply the same patterns to a more interesting system.

I started simple this time.

I wanted a PERSON class and a GIFT class.


A Person has been given gifts and may give gifts (and a few other common attributes).

class CreatePeople < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def change
    create_table :people do |t|
      t.string :first_name
      t.string :last_name
      t.date :date_of_birth
      t.string :email_address


One of the things that I can’t decide if I like is the automatic pluralization of words, especially People/Person. I would have been content with a Persons table, but when creating a model, by default (as I’m aware it can be overridden), a Person is mapped to a table called “People.”

The second table, Gifts is very simple:

class CreateGifts < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def change
    create_table :gifts do |t|
      t.string :description
      t.integer :from_person_id
      t.integer :to_person_id

As I thought I might want a richer structure for the Gift class in the future, I did not use the more standard “person_id” name for the foreign key column that maps a gift to a Person. I wanted the column name to be more obvious what it was. Additionally, I needed two columns that both mapped to a “Person", so I couldn’t have both be called “person_id” anyway.

By deviating from the normal pattern, there are a few expectations when defining the ActiveRecord class. It was these expectations that weren’t clear to me (especially with examples).

The Ruby class for Gift is defined like so:

class Gift < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :from_person, :class_name => "Person", :foreign_key => "from_person_id"
  belongs_to :to_person, :class_name => "Person", :foreign_key => "to_person_id"

and the Person:

class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many  :gifts_given , :class_name => "Gift", :foreign_key => "from_person_id"
  has_many  :gifts, :foreign_key => "to_person_id"

The key (and the ‘ah ha’ moment for me) was the use of the foreign_key parameter to the on the has_many and belongs_to associations.

In the Gift class, I included the belongs_to association macro. In this case, :from_person is the name of the rich accessor method (which looks like a property in other languages) that will be added to the Gift class. Using the symbol :class_name is like a class finding assistant. Without it, the Rails framework assumes that there would be a class named “FromPerson.” Of course, that would fail. By specifying “Person,” I’ve indicated to Rails that the class it should map to is called “Person” which I defined earlier. The :foreign_key symbol and value indicates which column in the backing table has the value which will map to an instance of a Person. In the SQL table, I added a “from_person_id” column and this points at that as the “from_person_id” column is the foreign key to the People table. (The same is true for :to_person.)

Looking at the Person class, it is using another common association macro, :has_many. :Has_many when used here, is indicating that a Person may have zero or more “gifts.” The new accessor method is named gifts (by using :gifts). Here, too, you’ll specify the name of the foreign_key. Again, repeat this for the :gifts_given automatically added accessor method. One interesting thing is that only :gifts_given requires the :class_name to be specified. The reason is that Rails automatically maps :gifts to the Gifts class (by way of naming). The :gifts_given cannot be automatically mapped, so you need to give (sigh) it a little help.

Here’s a little test:

>> jason = Person.find(1)
  Person Load (18.0ms)  SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE "people"."id" = ? LIMIT 1  [["id", 1]]
#<Person id: 1, first_name: "Jason", last_name: "Bourne", date_of_birth: nil, email_address: nil, created_at: "2012-01-06 13:47:40", updated_at: "2012-01-07 03:10:29">
>> jason.gifts_given
  Gift Load (0.0ms)  SELECT "gifts".* FROM "gifts" WHERE "gifts"."from_person_id" = 1
[#<Gift id: 1, description: "Machine Gun", from_person_id: 1, to_person_id: 4, created_at: "2012-01-07 14:39:17", updated_at: "2012-01-07 14:39:17">]
>> jason.gifts_given[0].to_person.first_name
  Person Load (0.0ms)  SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE "people"."id" = 4 LIMIT 1
>> jason.gifts_given[0].to_person.gifts
  [#<Gift id: Gift Load (1.0ms)1  SELECT "gifts".* FROM "gifts" WHERE "gifts"."to_person_id" = 4
, description: "Machine Gun", from_person_id: 1, to_person_id: 4, created_at: "2012-01-07 14:39:17", updated_at: "2012-01-07 14:39:17">]
>> jason.gifts_given[0].to_person.gifts[0].from_person.first_name
  Person Load (0.0ms)  SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE "people"."id" = 1 LIMIT 1

I added two people: Jason, and Magnum, and one gift before executing the code above. Jason, as you should be able to follow, gave a wonderful gift to Magnum. As you can see, by using the automatically added accessor methods by way of the association macros described above, I was able to traverse the database structure very easily when mapped to a few simple objects.

One plus of experimenting and testing with the console while using Rails/Ruby in this case is that the output includes the SQL commands that are executed when the various method calls are made. Here’s an example where I rolled multiple calls into one chained call:

>> jason = Person.find(1).gifts_given[0].to_person.first_name
  Person Load (19.0ms)  SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE "people"."id" = ? LIMIT 1  [["id", 1]]
  Gift Load (0.0ms)  SELECT "gifts".* FROM "gifts" WHERE "gifts"."from_person_id" = 1
  Person Load (0.0ms)  SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE "people"."id" = 4 LIMIT 1

EzData for Ember.js

Previous post: Entity reference

I’ve been extending my original post (above) in an effort to create a simple entity system using Ember.js (SproutCore 2.0). While it’s grown in sophistication, it is far from complete. Smile

The project is now located on GitHub.

This is the introduction, from the readme on GitHub.

EmberJS – EZData

EZData is a library intended to a simple way of accessing data from a relational database when using Ember.js. It will never try to be everything to everyone. :) Instead, it’s intended to be small, efficient, and easy to learn and use javascript library.

The basic functionality is that it’s designed to manipulate individual entities (or Records), not a complex object structure that is often stored as JavaScript objects. This mirrors what’s found in many web systems today in the data model.

Right now, the project is brand new and quite in flux.


Create types by calling Entity.define (instead of the typical Ember.Object.extend).

DemoApp.Person = Entity.define(Entity, "Person", {

    fullName:function () {
        return this.get('lastName') + ", " + this.get('firstName');
    }.property('firstName', 'lastName')

This will create a new Class internally by using Ember.extend but it also does some other magic (e.g., creating a data store for all entities of a given type). First and foremost, by calling define, it’s expected that you’re mirroring a relational data structure of some sort which may have foreign key relationships to other tables.

In the example above, the Person entity is expected to have the following columns in a database table:

  • id => Number (from the basic Entity type)
  • firstName => String
  • lastName => String
  • DOB => DOB

Each property is assigned the basic data type that it will contain. The data type is used for linking and serialization.


The second example is a Gift:

DemoApp.Gift = Entity.define(Entity, "Gift", {

The Gift class is more interesting as one of the properties links to another type/Class (Person). As a direct connection to a Person as an object instance isn’t possible in traditional relational tables, some automatic linking occurs by declaring this linkage.

The from property is mapped to a second, hidden property that is only used for the foreign key relationship. By default, the hidden property will be calledfromPersonId. This can be overridden by creating a custom naming function, replacing the default stored atEntity.Settings.FOREIGN_KEY_GENERATOR_FUNCTION.

By making the linkage between the two types in the way demonstrated above, the standard Ember.js handlebar templating engine (and automatic value updating) features just work (see from.fullName below).

{{#each gifts}}
        {{ name }}
        {{ excitement }}
        {{ from.fullName }}

The fullName property of Person is a computed property, and continues to work as expected.

Getting the Data

If you want to retrieve a list from one of the data stores (or data tables), it’s a simple as calling the live function for one of the stores.

In the example below, there are two live collections. The first returns all of the gifts, and the second only returns gifts that have a lowercase letter o in the name.

// create some "live" connections to the data store
DemoApp.mainController.set('gifts', Entity.Stores.get(DemoApp.Gift).live());
// create a live connection with a filter (returns true if it contains the letter 'o')
DemoApp.mainController.set('giftsFiltered', Entity.Stores.get(DemoApp.Gift).live(
    function () {
        return this.get('name').indexOf('o') > -1;

To get access to one of the automatically created data stores, call Entity.Stores.get({Class}) where {Class} is the type that was created using thedefine method.

Notes / Cautions

Right now, all entities are required to have a property called id and be of type Number.